Sunday, August 25, 2013

Why We Walk

Sunday, August 28, 1963 was a seminal day in the history of our country.

It was so important and transformative that even now, 50 years later, we are still trying to figure it all out.

The march on Washington is remembered for the “I Have a Dream” speech by the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

For those of us who were born after that march, time has been compressed. We cannot know, and thus cannot remember, the month and months of tension that preceded and followed that march.  Yes, we have seen the film clips and footage, in classrooms, in television shows, on youtube even. But we can’t really know the anguish of times.

We know that social anguish of our own times, though, that are happening now.

This morning’s order of service features two black leaders who helped to bring the 1963 March on Washington to fruition. Whitney Young, Jr. and Arnita Young Boswell. Arnita and I went to church together for years before I knew she was Whitney Young’s sister. Before I knew how deeply involved she was in the 1960’s.

I had to learn about that part of her life from a class I took at the University of Illinois in Chicago. I opened a book for a class I was taking on the 1960’s, and there was a picture of Arnita and her brother.

Now you have to know that to me Arnita was just the nice lady at church who felt it has her responsibility to make sure that all dishes from coffee hour got washed each week. She was a professor at the University of Chicago, and that was about all I knew.

So I went to her to ask about the photo. And she admitted to me that yes she had been involved in that work, and yes, Whitney had been her brother.

My mind was blown.

She told me that the work was not done.


When Arnita died in 2002 it was a big loss for our church. And I guess, our world.


The work is not done.

This morning, there are 11 Pilgrims walking into the town of Selma, California, each of them representing 1 million others, each undocumented, each seeking a pathway to citizenship. By this morning these 11 people will have walked 186 miles down the Central Valley, on their way to Bakersfield. They have walked day after day.

285 miles in 21 days.

Several of us met the 11 Pilgrims in Merced last Monday. Kevin, Cass, Janice, Denis and I were met in Merced by Mary Ann and Rosa. Kevin, Cass, Denis and Mary Ann all walked a mile with the 11. Janice and I waited for them at the church, with cool water and hugs waiting for them.

Our four arrived at the church sweaty and looking and solemn in their yellow Standing on the Side of Love colors.


The pictures I’ve seen of the March on Washington show faces exuberant in the moment. Estimates of the attendees range from between 200 and 300 thousand people, people who were there estimated that 75-80% of the marchers were African American.

Clancy Sigal wrote this week in The Guardian, that there had been fears about the march…

But, against the doomsayers, an almost supernatural peace and good will reigned. Strangers became lifelong friends. A lot of us were astonished at how beautiful and strong we felt. On that hot, sunny day a genuine rainbow coalition of Quakers, Catholics, atheists, black and white church and social justice groups, labor unions, socialists and God-fearers poured into Washington because we felt that it was terribly important to be there.[1]

It was terribly important to have been there, to have participated…to have lent one’s voice and one’s body to a cause.

And this behavior continues.

This morning’s Reading from the Global Scripture was taken from the Final Instructions[2] that were sent out to participants before the 1963 March on Washington took place.  There are 11 pages of instructions, and one form to fill out.

The instructions lay out clearly the level of behavior expected by the leadership who organized the march. Instructions ranged from the signs you were allowed to carry, right down to a suggested lunch that you should pack.

There were clear instructions about what to wear. “Dress as if you were going to church.”


At first, my inner-Unitarian Universalist bristled at all of this instruction and seeming commands from on high.

And then I thought about it for a while.


A. Phillip Randolph and Bayard Rustin, the chief organizers of the March knew that this was a sort of coming out party for a movement. They knew that after a particularly horrid couple of years in race relations, this march would be a media frenzy. The media was going to be there to either cover the biggest race riot in American history, or it was going to be there to show the biggest single event of racial unity and respectful request for equality.

They knew how they wanted to frame this moment in history, and so they laid out, in clear detail, what they expected from people.

And the people responded to their requests with compliance, because they sensed and knew also that this was going to be a moment in history, and that they were responsible for it.

So they came in their Sunday best. The men in suits and ties, the women in finery, in the 90 plus degree heat of a Washington DC August.

They have inspired millions of people to follow in their footsteps.

There have now been so many peaceful marches on Washington that it would be difficult to count them all. But the number of the marches does nothing to minimize the meaning that each march has to those who are walking there.

As I said a moment ago, when I was reading the rules that were laid out for the March, I bristled a little at the idea of the authority being expressed in them. I thought “who are these guys to tell me how to dress and what to bring?”

Me, as if I had even been alive to be there. But you get my meaning.

One of the dangers and benefits of loving another minister is that often work follows you home. And when you talk about things, not just related directly to this congregation, but to our greater faith of the global Unitarian Universalism, sometimes the other guy says something that you just can’t help quoting.

Wednesday, when the choir hosted a pot-luck, get together, invite new people to sing with us, we were talking about the Sanctuary, and the Rev. Denis Paul started talking about the sacred.

He said that when something is sacred, you treat it differently, with a reverence. And then he grabbed a hymnal that had been water-damaged and mold had set in. A hymnal that he found on his chair the Sunday before.


What we do here, week after week, when we gather is not of the same level of import on the national stage as the 1963 March on Washington for Freedom and Jobs, or the 1993 March on Washington for Lesbian, Gay, and Bi Equal Rights and Liberation, or what the 11 very vulnerable human beings are doing today walking from Sacramento to Bakersfield, in homage to Cesar Chavez’s march to Sacramento.

What we do here though is important.

When I think about the differences between the 1963 March and the 1993 March on Washington, some glaring differences strike me.


For one, in 1993 there was no dress code, implied or otherwise, and the photos show it. The 1993 March lacks the dignity of the 1963 march.

The 1963 March had a solemnity to it that made the world pay attention.

In part, I can’t help but think, because people put aside their side issues, and their side concerns and all focused on one goal: raising awareness of the plight of people of color in our nation. The organizers and the marchers recognized that in order to be successful they had to be able to engage those who would be seeing this march, that they the participants would have to be able to use an event in which the collective dignity was unquestionable.

In presenting unquestionable dignity to the nation, the nation, the white majority, would have to re-examine they way their fellow Americans had been mistreated for centuries.

It was a sacred duty they were carrying out, and they all knew it.


In order to affect a change, a change that has still not come to fruition, 300 thousand individuals had to agree to come together and focus on one task.

And when they did that, change came.


As in all things, our Unitarian Universalism has blessings and challenges.

We are a church of the free mind. We have no creedal test. We have no dress code, few expectations and we like it that way.

But my question about that is this, “Are we losing something in the exchange?”

Are we by our very casualness diminishing the very important work of caring for our spirits? Is our lack of taking ourselves too seriously costing us the gravitas that our spiritual and religious work deserves?

Is this why so many people refer to our churches as country clubs of like-minded people?

Maybe what they don’t see in our churches nation-wide is a sense that we are engaged in anything important, because we don’t act as if we are doing anything important together.


The people who took busses and trains to Washington DC in August of 1963 knew they were doing something important. So important that I worry the word important doesn’t do it justice.

They knew on some level that they were fighting either for their lives, if they were African American, or if they were a white ally, they knew they were struggling for a world made more fair for all.

Isn’t that also our goal? A world made more fair for all?

Why do we walk? Why do we march on Washington?

We do so to demonstrate to the world what matters to us deeply.


I do hope you’ll consider travelling to Bakersfield on September 2nd for the culminating event for the Pathways to Citizen effort. This is the event that the UU Legislative Ministries, and PICO have asked as many Californians to attend as possible. I know there will be busses from Modesto to Bakersfield, but I don’t have all the details yet. If you can come along, please contact the church office, so that when I get information I can pass it along. 



What lessons can we take from the 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom?

One of those lessons I think we can learn is that there is a time for play and a time for work. Work time doesn’t need to be without joy and laughter, but it does need it’s own honored time. I’m sure that more than one marcher in 1963 had spent the Friday night before the march at a jazz club.

But when it came time to do the sacred work of societal change, that reveler put on their Sunday best and focused on the task at hand.

Our important work, our sacred work, of attending to our spiritual lives, deserves a time of it’s own, set apart from the rest of the week. Our work deserves to be elevated to a place wherein something special happens.

As we enter into our 60th year of Fellowship, let us celebrate the work that has already taken place. Our forebears and we ourselves have offered up the sacrifices of time, talent and treasure.

Let us honor those sacrifices by treating what we have here in this Sanctuary, the people, our covenant, with deep respect and caring for one another.


Amen.




[1] http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/aug/24/march-on-washington-anniversary-martin-luther-king
[2] http://www.crmvet.org/docs/moworg2.pdf


Why We Walk
© Rev. Joseph M Cherry
Written for and Delivered to
The Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of Stanislaus County

Sunday, August 18, 2013

Shall We Gather?

I'm about to confess something that I thought I might never say.

I'm pretty close to being "churched-out."


Your Board of Trustees and I have just returned from our annual retreat together, and it was a doozy! 

We engaged in spiritual development work together and THEN after doing that tried to see how our own individual developments fit together, or didn't, and how we might bring our work back to the congregation.

There was a lot of discussion about how and why we gather together, which dovetails quite nicely with Roy's music this morning.  I don't know whether I should thank both Roy and The Universe for that, or just enjoy a happy coincidence.

What is it about human beings and our need to gather in community? 

Being together can be messy, uncomfortable, challenging and sometimes down right difficult.

And yet we do. We gather.

We are not like other solitary animals in the world. We do not get born, pass through adolescence and strike out on our own, like the male lion or the female black widow.

Even if we do strike out on our own from our family of origin, we create a new community, sometimes even what's called a "family of choice."  Or as I heard the Rev. Mark Bellatini said once, "After many years and  heartbreaks, I have come to love my horizontal family, and my vertical, or biological, family."

It was the support of Rev. Mark's horizontal family, the family he created for himself, that helped him to make peace with the family he was born into.


Churches are often described in terms of a family. Ministers study both family systems and church systems, and many of the models overlap.

Back home in Chicago, I have church aunties. There is Betty, Bette, Joan, Madieria, Evelyn and Cindy. There used to also be Polly and Ann, but they have passed on.

My church aunties have as much authority in my life as the aunts who are related to me by blood, some have more.

These are the ladies who taught me so very much about how to navigate the world in a new way, in the way that my class-jumping education required of me. They are my mentors, and when I go home to visit Chicago if I don't see them in church, oooo there is trouble!

In fact, Betty's daughter and granddaughter recently moved to Oakland, and I got a call from her. "Jala has moved to California, I want to know how far you are from her, because she's out there without any other family."

Any   "other"  family.

It doesn't matter to Betty, or to Jala or her daughter, that they are African American and I am not. What matters is that we have a church family connection.



If we can let ourselves relax into our communal relationship, there are so very many benefits. Yes, it might be a little scary at first. Letting one's guard down can be very frightening. By the time you've reached the age that you are, the world has kicked you around a bit.

I can say this with confidence because by the time each of us has reached kindergarten, the world has already gotten in our way.



In my time here already I have seen the bonds of a church family.  I have talked before about the time I was new here and I was so moved by the fact that 10% of this entire community showed up at Martin Zonglit's Memorial, each with a job to do at the memorial and the team, though I doubt they'd use that word, worked like a well-oiled machine of caring. More than 10% of course came to honor Martin, but that isn't so surprising, after all he was a long time member and very active. 


I mentioned this at our retreat this weekend, and then others said "Well, about 10% of our whole community works regularly with Bill on shelter meals," and "about 10% of us went to the City Council meeting with you last year," and about 10% of us .... and the list goes on.

So, this got me really thinking about 10%. What is it with that number? 

I have to and want to tell you that 10% is a very respectable chunk of people from a church to show up to do work together.  And it's not always the same 10% who show up, either.

One of the exercises  we did this weekend was to think about a goal. And then we were asked to come up with three categories for that goal.

What is the minimum result of this goal that you can live with?
What is the actual goal?
What is something that you can imagine that would make this goal an outrageous success? 

10% of a congregation showing up and working together is a good goal. It's a laudable goal, and you should be very proud that this happens regularly here.  But what would be an outrageous goal? 90% participation? 

That would be outrageous and amazing. 

Imagine a project where we could 90% of the congregation could agree to work on one project together, may be a project with multiple facets. 



So the Board agreed that one of the tasks they would take on this year was to figure out what sort of a project would ignite the passion of this congregation. What sort of social justice work would resonate with enough people that 90% of the congregation would focus energy on one project.

In order to do this, the Board wants us all to have coffee together. In the coming weeks, the Board is going to start having conversations with people about finding out what our community-wide passion is. This will take time, which members of your Board of Trustees are willing to invest, outside of their regular duties, to help bring into fruition.

Because this is a big undertaking, the Board will be recruiting some help. In it's current, but developing form, there'll be a few open ended questions that you'll each be asked, and then we'll gather all the information and present it to the congregation.


I hope that when they call you up to meet for coffee, or to take a little time during social hour, you will do your best to meet with them. It's for the good of the whole.



What we have here is a lovely and loving community. The Rev. Sonya Sukalski, who led our Board retreat this weekend, said to me "What a fine Board. They really care deeply about their work and each other."

I have seen people try to care for each other, which is such a beautiful thing. Karen Odell has issued a standing offer to help Jane Fenton come to church. I have seen Kathy Conrotto and Ann Krabach help Aileen Olmheim time after time. We have people check and re-check to make sure that Ted and April can move around our sanctuary unencumbered, week after week.  

There's a line in "What a Wonderful World" that gets me every time. "I see friends shaking hands, saying How do you do? They're really saying 'I Love You."

To me, that's church.



We are in a year of transition. Of course, this is actually year 3 of a transition, but who's counting?

By this time next year your new minister will be in the office where I now work, they will be standing behind this pulpit, and have just spent a weekend with the Board on retreat, working on a direction for the congregation for that year, and likely beyond.

While things are especially fluid, it is a good time to do things like look at the congregation's 5 year plan, an effort which is being led by Brittney Miller. It's a good time to re-evaluate the church's finances, led by John Patton, who is working side by side with Doreen Souza and Mary Lee.

It's a good time to look at a lot of things.  What is the gift this congregation offers to the Central Valley?

This Fellowship contains both amazing power and amazing potential.


These questions about direction and mission are not for me to answer, but for you, the collective you, to answer. This is work you must do together. It may well be work that brings you closer together, closer to being a church family.


Roy just told us a story and we sang "Shall We Gather By the River."*

There may not be an actual river here on this property, maybe only a metaphorical one, and the answer to the question "Shall We Gather?" is yes.


You bet we should. 



*Guest musician Roy Zimmerman

© The Rev. Joe Cherry
Written for and presented to
The Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of Stanislaus County
August 18, 2013

Sunday, August 11, 2013

A Year of Justice

It is good to be together again.

This afternoon the Unitarian Universalist Legislative Ministry here in California, will be having a training here, after church. Perhaps you saw the training on our church calendar, which is on our website, maybe you saw Kevin Byrne’s request for volunteer help through our weekly eBlast. Maybe this is the first you’ve heard of it. Anything’s possible.

The Unitarian Universalist Legislative Ministry of California, or UULMCA for short, is one our largest and best organized Legislative Ministries across our nation. In the past 10 years they’ve done a lot of work, organized a lot of folks and made a real name for themselves in Sacramento. Rev. Lindi Ramsey is just completed a decade of work with that community ministry.

And we know a little bit about community ministries here in this congregation. We have two ministers who work in their “semi-retirement” for the greater good of the people of this very county. We have Rev. Leroy Egenberger who has been working with veterans and their families, helping them to adjust to life after military service, and we have Rev. Bill Greer, whose ministry of feeding those who are hungry has deeply infected and affected almost all of us. By its very nature, Rev. Leroy’s work is quiet and contained.  But not Rev. Bill’s.  If you have worked with Bill in the kitchen, or served food in the last year, please raise your hand.

I am grateful for the work of both Bill and Leroy. They do things that I cannot. I wouldn’t have time to run a program that feeds hundreds of people each month, and I don’t have the training to do the specialized work that Leroy does.  They are both tremendous assets to our congregation.

Rev. Lindi Ramsey is another person whose work I am grateful for. When I arrived in Modesto 20 months ago, and Lindi called me up to do some sort of political action, I responded, and so did Rev. Denis Paul. We showed up in your bright yellow clergy shirts, and helped to hold 4,000 prayers from across theological and geological barriers, that were being delivered to Governor Brown’s office, hoping they would inspire him to consider more equitable immigration policies.

He was unable to answer our prayers that time, by the way.

At the time we first met in person, I told Rev. Lindi “I’m so new to California, and I'm so new to ministry, that I have no idea which end is up with regard to the political and the social in California. I also don’t feel like I have much time right now to figure it all out. So how about we make a deal? When you need me to show up, you just call me, and I will show up. You give me the talking points you want me to say to any media who asks me, and I will say it. Our ministries are co-mingled.”

I have said similar things to both Leroy and Bill.

And so I have now been to Sacramento, to the State Capitol, and petted the Golden Bear in front of the Governor’s office 3 times. That is more times than I was EVER in the State Capitol of Michigan, where I lived for 27 years and was a gay activist.

So when the UULM asked to hold a meeting here today, I said “Yes!” and was inspired to talk with you this morning about a year of social justice.
In June, Solange Gonçalves Atlman was a guest speaker in this congregation. Ms. Altman is an immigration attorney and shared with the congregation a terrific talk about immigration and the unjust laws that currently govern it here. She told us heart breaking stories of children who, by no choice of their own, came to be here in the U.S. without documentation.  She also quoted to us a rather famous story of an exchange between Henry David Thoreau and Ralph Waldo Emerson.

“In 1848 Henry David Thoreau, a transcendentalist, was arrested and jailed after refusing to pay his poll tax, a tax that would be used to support slavery and its extension through a war with Mexico intended to acquire its northern territories. His friend, Ralph Waldo Emerson came to see him in jail, and exclaimed upon seeing him, "What are you doing in there?" Thoreau replied, "Waldo, the question is what are you doing out there?"

Thoreau's brief detention became the inspiration for his essay, Civil Disobedience. In that essay he explains that in a constitutional republic like the United States, people often think that the proper response to an unjust law is to try to use the political process to change the law, but to obey and respect the law, in the mean time, until it is changed. But if the law is itself clearly unjust, and the lawmaking process is not designed to quickly obliterate such unjust laws, then Thoreau says the law deserves no respect and it should be broken. He tells us that "it is not desirable to cultivate a respect for the law, so much as for what is right."[1]

Immigration reform and the just treatment of those in our community who among us without documentation is an issue that we take seriously and work hard for in Unitarian Universalism. The very president of our Association of Congregations was arrested in Arizona two years ago protesting the treatment of so called “illegals.”

The UULMCA gave me my first chance to be a voice, the voice of a religious leader, on the issue of reforming the laws for immigration.

But the UULMCA does more than work to reform immigration policies. They work on environmental issues, developing lay and young leadership, and for years worked to coordinate efforts to provide marriage equality for same sex couples here in California.

Let’s hope they can retire that topic once and for all.

But it’s not just Rev. Lindi Ramsden and the UULMCA who are doing the work. The UULMCA is, for me, a clearing house of information. The UULMCA cannot do its work effectively without dedicated Unitarian Universalists who work hard, who carry signs, who go to city council meetings, who pack lunches, and hug those who are marginalized.


This year, though, I’m going to challenge us to focus energy on Social Justice. I know, I know, we have that whole pesky “search for a new minister” going on, and that whole “rethinking the way we fund our Fellowship” thing, oh, and the whole “This is our 60th year gathering together as a congregation,” thing.

All kidding aside, I think these are exactly the reasons that we should really focus some serious energy into Social Justice.

I want to tell share with you and story I read on the Ms. Magazine blog. It’s the story of a group of women in Israel who call themselves “The Women of the Wall.”[2]

These women, who are of different branches of Judaism, have been meeting together and praying together for 24 years, at the Wailing Wall.

So what, you might say, people have been praying at the Wailing Wall since Herod the Great started building  the Second Great Temple in 19 BCE (before common era, what used to be called “Before Christ”) and it was destroyed by the Romans in the Frist Jewish-Roman war in 70 CE (what used to be called A.D.)

Well, it turns out that the Women of the Wall do not pray in the tiny section of the Wall that the Ultra-Orthodox have decided should be the section for the women. No, these women have the nerve to pray wherever they want to, along the wall! Also, to the consternation of some, they read aloud from the Torah, which according to some, is against Jewish Law.

In the 24 years they have been meeting, they have been hassled, harassed, tear-gassed and arrested for praying together along the Wall. Shira Pruce, who is the Public Relations Director for the Women of the Wall, was interviewed for the article, and she reports that the ultra-orthodox have used their political influence unduly in trying to restrain the freedom of expression and religion expression in the democracy that is Israel.

I bring you this story from Ms. Magazine in part to bring you back to the reading earlier by Emerson, that great radical, that great free-thinker, who we are so often proud of. He says there are some things that are fated, and that there is a nobility in accepting those things.

And yet his dear friend, Henry David Thoreau challenged him on it. And this example of these women praying together offers yet another challenge to that idea.

So, not to through Emerson out with the bathwater, I ask you, what are the things in your life, in our collective lives, that are noble to accept, and which are the ones we should work like Hell to change?

I have seen a bumper sticker that says “Well behaved women rarely make history.”

I must confess that I love that bumper sticker.

Think of all the women in our faith’s history that have re-shaped the world because they refused to accept the status quo, and also think of the men who worked by their sides.

This, as well as a self-examining faith that requires no statement of belief or creedal test, this is among the greatest gifts and challenges of our legacy.

We are a people who work to improve the world around us. We claim little, if any knowledge about the next world, the world beyond death, even if there is one.

As unsure as we are about all of that, we are as sure that it will take the hands of people like us to shape the world into a more fair and just world for all.

Theodore Parker famously wrote “the arc of the universe is long and it bends toward justice.” Well, the arc isn’t going to do that all by itself. It’s going to require people to help shape that arc.

Working actively for social justice can do many things for us as congregation. As we are out visible in the world, more people will see us, more people who are like-minded to us may see us and wonder just who those people over there are, and why do I keep seeing that group of lovely folks at every social justice event I attend. Maybe I should go talk with them.

Working actively for social justice will catch the attention of minister’s who are looking for just such an amazing group of people who are here, in Modesto.

Working actively for social justice will help to enrich our lives both individually and collectively, and aren’t we a congregation about enriching lives?

So let us commit ourselves, in this our 60th year as a Fellowship, let us renew our commitment to engaging in social justice.

You can start by staying around for this afternoon’s meeting.



[1] Unjust Laws: The Moral Case for Immigration Reform,” © Solange Gonçalves Altman, 2013

[2] Misogyny at the Wall, http://msmagazine.com/blog/2013/08/05/misogyny-at-the-wailing-wall/


A Year of Justice
© The Rev. Joseph M Cherry
Written for and delivered to:
The Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of Stanislaus County
August 11, 2013